r/mildlyinfuriating • u/AttachedHeartTheory • 3h ago
I just wanted a hot dog I lost 55 pounds over the last 12 months and reached the weight suggested by my doctor. I celebrated with a brand new smart scale... that immediately told me my BMI is 30.1 and that I am still obese.
I have been putting in the work. Walking. Eating right. Not cheating on my diet. I had some health issues that my doctor discovered, and I worked really hard to get to a goal weight of 208 pounds. I finally hit my goal weight. I bought a smart scale to celebrate and memorialize where I'm at today. And the first thing it did was tell me I was obese and send me a notification asking if I would like weight loss advice.
Sometimes you just feel like life is 5 steps forward and 10 steps back.
I feel like this post flair is appropriate.
1.7k
u/SunnyTheMasterSwitch 3h ago
If you are obese then I am a titan of greek mythology
112
u/PudPullerAlways 2h ago
Time to cast you for a live action God Of War movie :D
→ More replies (2)11
→ More replies (6)40
u/eggcracked2wice 1h ago
I assess people's fitness and body composition for a living and imo either OP's scale is wrong or he's full of it.
BMI is better for assessing populations than individuals, and it cannot give a full picture of an individual's health. Literally everyone knows this.
But if you look like that with a BMI of 30, you may have an adamantium skeleton.
If OP has managed to achieve a truly miraculous level of muscular density and is tipping the scales that way... he'd be well aware and seeing this as a huge win. Not posting it here.
→ More replies (3)21
u/FunGuy8618 1h ago edited 1h ago
Yeah.... Dude has pretty negligible muscle mass so unless he gets a dexa to find out, the doctor is right to assume higher levels of visceral fat. Which wouldn't be outside of the realm of possibility. Unlikely but that's the info the doc has to work with.
2.5k
u/PhoneWalletKeysID 3h ago
You look healthy, don’t let a shitty piece of hardware tell you otherwise. Fantastic work! You should be very proud of yourself.
873
u/salter77 3h ago
I would put the blame on how BMI is calculated rather than the overpriced calculator.
Isn’t BMI just calculated based on weight and height? Muscle is actually more heavy than fat, so muscular people may have high BMI.
267
u/Bilboswaggings19 3h ago
Indeed, imagine being an NHL superstar and BMI thinks you are very obese because of the muscle and the height
135
u/NightShadowWolf6 3h ago
I had a friend who was into competitive soccer (or futbol where I am from). His legs were similar in muscle tone to some star athletes of the sport. He had defined abdominals on a leaner upper body.
We went for a health check up when enetering uni, and you can bet your arse the nurse checking us told him he was "obese" according just to his BMI...nevermind how he looked, or the fact that he was in better shape than 99% of the students there.
45
u/AwkwardSummers 2h ago
My husband has a six pack and is "overweight" according to bmi. Meanwhile, my stomach jiggles when I walk and my bmi is "normal" lol.
38
u/0kShr00mer 3h ago edited 3h ago
To your point, Arnold would have been 'morbidly obese" during his prime bodybuilding years based on BMI. It also doesn't take into consideration a person's bone/tendon density; which is highly dependent on genetics and increases with consistent exercise.
16
u/kielkaisyn 2h ago
Peak competition Arnold was barely into obese during his prime, at around 30-33BMI. Morbidly obese is hyperbole. He would have looked like Zangief from street fighter.
The only famous person I'm aware of who attained morbid obesity was Ronnie Coleman, who only had that weight during non-competition season when he was bulking and would have looked quite burly and definitely was very unhealthy (not to mention the steroids/his heart).
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)8
u/LordShesho 2h ago
Arnold at his highest competition weight of 240 would have barely cleared into the obese range lmao, what are you on about? And he was jacked with insane amount of roids to get to that level. No normal, natty person is getting to the obese range with pure muscle.
32
u/-duckduckduckduck- 2h ago
Imagine thinking the exceptions that apply to body builders and professional athletes apply to you, a person is neither of those things.
→ More replies (12)21
u/Nuva_Ring 2h ago
Everyone in these comments are apparently athletes because bmi applies to none of them.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)6
u/My_Brain_0422 1h ago
Yes but most people aren't NHL superstars. BMI is meant for the average person as a single tool. Not NHL players or The Rock.
34
u/crankyandhangry 2h ago
This is true, but only a very small percentage of the population are so muscular that their BMI would put them at "obese" while they had a healthy body fat percentage. I suspect OP's scale is just fucked.
→ More replies (4)14
u/viciouspandas 2h ago
It's far more common for BMI to say someone is not obese when they actually are, than the other way around, but nobody ever brings that up in the West at least. There's always exceptions though.
→ More replies (25)16
u/Huge_Piece_7513 3h ago
That's not what's happening here. It's common, maybe even more common than the "obesity from muscle" scenario you've outlined.
He's skinny fat, coming down from being chubby. Those that aren't chubby don't really have any way to know just how bad it is. You spend months and months to lose 30lbs, finally see defined abs, back, even some definition in your legs, only to realize you have another 30lbs to lose. Then probably another 30. Maybe another 30 after that. Then you start lifting heavy and eating bigger meals to put weight on. Then lose it again. Then bulk up again. Then lose it again. That's life.
The truth is that normal people don't lose fat to uncover muscle underneath, they lose fat to uncover what looks like muscle but turns out to actually be more fat to lose. Then again. And again. And again.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (8)5
u/Stomatita 1h ago
I agree with everything you said, and it is truly something to be proud of, but just want to say that "looking" healthy can sometimes be deceiving. I had a friend who looked amazing, not like fully ripped but you could tell he took care of himself and had a great body. Went to get some routine checks at the doctor and he was a cheeseburger away from having a heart attack, arteries were absolutely clogged with fat.
765
u/zxcoleman RED 3h ago
Silly question but are you sure you put in your height correctly? Smart scales just use predefined tables to calculate BMI. Also, BMI doesn't do a good job of factoring in muscle mass vs body fat content. People with large muscle mass (professional bodybuilders) and very low body fat will still come up with a high BMI. Instead of being upset about a number that, based on your photo, appears to be way off, celebrate your amazing achievement!
233
u/scorgie 2h ago
Yea this guy isn't "so muscular he's technically obese" either so he's probably put in something wrong.
→ More replies (7)71
u/One-Possible1906 2h ago
Right, he has a perfectly average looking body that BMI should be an accurate reflection of. He’s clearly not obese nor some extreme body builder shape that calculates as obese. I would question the calibration of the scale as well because at 5’9 he really does not look anywhere near 208 pounds no matter how he carries his weight
→ More replies (2)31
u/The_RESINator 1h ago
I'm 5'10 220lbs and the last time I looked like that I was 170lbs.
→ More replies (1)8
u/One-Possible1906 1h ago
Yeah I’m 5 inches shorter than OP and looked a lot bigger than he does at my highest weight of 165. I can’t imagine 5 inches could add over 50 pounds to that and look thinner without being too muscular to bend over or having a Willy the size of my forearm and made out of lead.
106
→ More replies (11)50
u/ImWhatsInTheRedBox 3h ago
I think it was last another guy had a "smart scale" tell him he was very overweight when he clearly wasn't. He lived somewhere in Asia and apparently the bmi settings is lower there.
So yeah, don't just trust what one of those scales says.
8
u/fcocyclone 1h ago
yeah, the smart scales that work off body impedance and only through the feet can be pretty bad. And I think this might be especially true for those who have lost weight, as often you still retain those thick calves you gained while doing the work of lifting your fatter self up every day, and those calves add extra resistance to the current.
→ More replies (2)5
u/Tricky-Ad7897 2h ago
That would be my next guess, is it perhaps an LG or Samsung Smart scale and you accidentally bought a Korean spec version? Cause that would be the kind of thing they'd do.
1.8k
u/lucky3698 3h ago
BMI is the dumbest calculation in the world. Never use that to determine your fitness or health.
740
u/jimscoolaid 3h ago
What do you mean? Its perfect if you are a young male going through puberty in the 1920s. That's really the only baseline for weight that anyone would ever need.
→ More replies (8)373
u/Sj410 3h ago edited 2h ago
A young white male
“The BMI was always designed as a metric for European men. For women, and people of non-European origin, the scale is often biased. As noted by sociologist Sabrina Strings, the BMI is largely inaccurate for black people especially, disproportionately labelling them as overweight even for healthy individuals.[54]”
229
u/gr8tfulbeetle45 3h ago
Just want to add that it was created in the 1800s by a mathematician with no medical experience. It’s actually wild that we use this at all in any medical settings
45
u/Old_Quality1990 2h ago
It was to find out the rates of various health outcomes in populations of 1 million people. It works on that scale but not on individual scale. Too much variation person to person.
•
u/feartheoldblood90 52m ago
Even at that scale it has huge racial bias implications tho
→ More replies (2)•
u/Weathervane_ 23m ago
I wouldn't say huge at that scale. There are some differences, but at the end of the day, human bodies are not so different where the sheer mass, calculated among enough individuals to account for lifestyle variance still has informative value.
Of course, there's possible exceptions like probably some Samoans who always defy nature, but by and large, the main criticism to BMI is how stupid it is for individuals.
29
u/takingthehobbitses 2h ago
I don't know about elsewhere in the US, but where I am they focus on BMI for literally everything. If it's even a little bit above average they will blame everything on that and you can barely get anyone to take you seriously. They also make sure to add it to your list of vitals on the printed forms they give you after your appointment. It's always at the top.
17
u/Rich_Bluejay3020 1h ago
And apparently once you’re labeled “obese” they don’t change it unless you specifically ask. Source: I lost a fuckton of weight and am still obese on my medical records despite being a normal BMI for over half a decade at this point lol
5
u/Take-to-the-highways 1h ago
In California in the early 2010s they would line all us children up and calculate our BMI and read it in front of our entire class
→ More replies (3)5
24
u/sarcasticorange 3h ago
Below 5'10
22
u/fri9875 3h ago
Yeah it starts getting funky as you get taller. I grew up extremely skinny but then got into weight lifting in college. According to BMI I was “overweight” at 6ft 185lbs, despite the fact that if anyone looked at me they’d say I was underweight.
BMI is just stupid. There’s really no circumstance where it ever makes sense, especially nowadays that we understand so much more.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (23)26
u/BaronVonHoopleDoople 2h ago
You're just going to leave out the next sentence from the Wikipedia article you pulled this quote from?
A 2012 study of BMI in an ethnically diverse population showed that "adult overweight and obesity were associated with an increased risk of mortality [...] across the five racial/ethnic groups".
Call me crazy, but I'm trusting the 180,000+ person scientific study by epidemiologists rather than a claim made by a sociologist in a book about fatphobia and racism.
→ More replies (2)69
u/NegotiationJumpy4837 2h ago edited 2h ago
For reference, if BMI tells you you are obese, that's accurate for 95% of men, and 99% of women. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2877506/
The real problem with BMI is for people that are told they are "normal" but actually still have too high of fat percentage (skinny fat type people).
I think most people hear that "BMI isn't accurate" and take the wrong message. It's a pretty reasonable first barometer to get a reality check. If it says you are obese, it's probably worth asking your doctor about, as that means you actually are obese in the overwhelming majority of cases.
8
u/smjurach 1h ago
I’m skinny fat and people don’t fucking listen to me when I say I need to lose weight. It’s so frustrating.
→ More replies (2)26
u/Michael_Dukakis 1h ago
redditors tend to believe they're too muscular for BMI to be accurate
→ More replies (3)•
u/Big_Assistant9329 23m ago
Exactly, BMI is mostly inaccurate for being too lenient, not the other way around. If you have too much muscle for bmi, you wouldn’t be using BMI.
I had BMI of 22 but I had love handles and no muscle. I did a Dexa scan and I had like 30% body fat. Took a few years to really fix the issue.
→ More replies (5)•
u/JalapenoPopPoop 53m ago
Yeah people always severely overestimate how often it's wrong. Whenever BMI comes up everyone immediately loves parrotting how you can actually be in good shape but the bmi will calculate wrong when that's only true for very intense body builders. Most other people are just handwaving away results that they don't like the sound of with an explanation that doesn't apply to them. Guys I promise you if your BMI says that you're large it's not because you're actually super duper jacked, it's because you've lost sense of what healthy sizes are
BMI will tell people they're obese and they throw it out as wrong because their idea of obese is people who are so fat they use mobility scooters or some extreme example and that's the only thing that counts as "obese" in their eyes so they ignore that they've got 4 extra inches of waistline due to fat
20
u/PatReady 3h ago
This is how the Army used to determine if you were out of regulation. They would take height then weight. If you were over 20BMI, they took your neck to belt line ratio and determined if you were too fat based on that.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (89)8
u/Mother_Chorizo 3h ago
It’s intended for population metrics and should never be used for an individual. I think the person that came up with the concept even said as much.
163
353
u/Baron_Light 3h ago
BMI does not distinguish between muscle, fat, and bone. It's a fairly dumb way to judge yourself and you should absolutely NOT feel bad about it.
→ More replies (14)
41
u/awatt25 3h ago
Throw that damned scale in the trash. You look fantastic. Great job!
→ More replies (1)
68
u/AReptileHissFunction 3h ago
Scales are only accurate at telling you one thing, your weight. You're wasting your money if you bought it for something else.
→ More replies (4)
55
18
30
u/Live_Life_and_enjoy 3h ago
You need to setup the height on your scale
Read the instruction manual, these things aren't meant to be used straight out of the box.
7
7
u/SuperFlik 3h ago
For anyone who doesn't know: The Body Mass Index was derived between 1830 and 1850 by a Belgian astronomer, has not changed at all in the past 200 years and played a key role in the development of eugenics.
BMI is pseudo science at best
17
u/xtrordinarlyOrdinary 3h ago
Same thing happened to me, I'm 6'3 and like 220ish lbs, I forgot to set my height.
Still chubby but I feel better about it.
→ More replies (1)
17
22
37
u/m3smth 3h ago
sigh... here we go again (almost daily it seems). Yes BMI can give outputs that don't align with reality, but as a whole, it's not terrible either
35
u/SkyYellow_SunBlue 3h ago
People bringing up The Rock being “obese” by this metric never look like The Rock.
→ More replies (3)11
u/look_at_tht_horse 1h ago
"BMI doesn't work if you have muscle!!"
The muscle in question:
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)9
5
u/pereline 1h ago
bmi is some bs. I'm 6'3" 170lbs and I look like a twig. to be "underweight" bmi I'd have to weigh 147lbs and I'm pretty sure I'd be in the hospital
4
u/Little-Basils 1h ago
BMI is a population measurement tool for research, it’s not suitable to determine the health and fitness of a single person
24
u/Global-Fact7752 3h ago
Don't pay any attention to the BMI how do you feel? and how is your energy.?
10
u/pepito1989 3h ago
You must be really dense, the body dense, not brain 🙂
Definitely don’t look like 30BMI, did you enter the height correctly? BMI is meaningless if you work out.
5
u/Vape_Like_A_Boss 3h ago
Smart scales aren't actually very smart and a lot of the features are useless. Like the ones that analyze water content and muscle mass and such. They're just taking a calculated guess based on their rudimentary algorithm.
4
u/dundeegimpgirl 3h ago
I am obese. I do not deny this. I do not agree with BMI numbers for a major reason. They scale came from a limited sampling and didn't include women or other races in the sample. Oh and it was created in the 1830's. The fact that the American Medical Association hasn't completed an updated study that samples all races and fitness levels. I don't think that a man or woman who is a body builder should be placed with someone who doesn't exercise because again they use height and weight and that's it. Muscle mass is not included. Long way to say that you look great don't base your self worth on an outdated index.
→ More replies (1)
5
u/explosive-diorama 1h ago
I'm 6'3". I hit 14.6% body fat, with abs slightly visible, at 208 lbs... about 13 lbs above the "overweight" BMI cutoff.
BMI is not a good measurement for individuals; it's generally only useful for populations. It's meant to summarize general weight of large groups of people, not to be a marker of individual health.
4
u/RealisticParking5184 1h ago edited 1h ago
BMI isn’t a scale I’d listen to. It’s heavily outdated. Do what makes YOU feel good about yourself.
You also look amazing!!!
4
u/Impressive-Yak-7449 1h ago
Height to weight tables are BS. Only way to truly know your BMI is going in a dunk tank. It measures your body's displacement and used with your weight to calculate BMI.
4
4
u/SuspendedResolution 1h ago
Yet again, BMI is a dog shit metric. Focus on your fitness, not your BMI.
4
u/Canadian_CJ 1h ago
Once you start getting lean/fit BMI doesn't mean much.
I was shocked in University, as a Varsity soccer player, to be considered overweight while I had barely any body fat and a shredded 6 pack and was running ungodly amounts between practices and games every week.
I have big legs, wide shoulders, me shredded is still "overweight", BMI means far less once you are fit.
If your doctor likes your body composition, ignore the smart scale. He now will care about your BMI, waist, BP, A1C, Cholesterol, and maybe chat about your cardiovascular health/resistance training, and together that will form a better picture.
Tell BMI to pound sand.
•
•
u/fascinatingshit 47m ago
I'm honestly shocked every time I still see BMI being taken seriously. It's inherently, deeply flawed and far from being a reliable indicator of overall health. A BMI that doesn't take into account the amount of weight your muscle accounts for is not worth your time or worth fretting over.
→ More replies (1)
17
13
u/brianlefebvrejr 3h ago
Ignore BMI it makes 0 sense and has no relevance. Body fat % is probably a better metric if you wanted to have one.
15
u/Stunning_Geese 3h ago
I'm 6'1.
I started dropping weight when I was at 350ish pounds. I'm 220 now and look great! I feel good, I look good, and my medical issues have gone away. It's taken almost 4 years to get here and a lot of hard work.
My smart scale tells me I'm overweight. According to the BMI scale, I should be under 190. I'd look like a skeleton at that weight!
→ More replies (6)3
u/seductivestain 1h ago
I'm 5'11 and 220 but have a LOT of lean mass thanks to being extremely fit and active through adolescence. BMI says I have to be under 180 to not be "overweight" but according to bodyfat metrics I would literally be dead below 175
8
u/WindSpecialist420 3h ago
Sets scale wrong... this IS mildly infuriating.
At 208 you would be 5'10" to have a 30 BMI
5
u/teamdragonite 3h ago
dude congrats! but some of us also know youre sucking in your stomach a bit lol
→ More replies (2)
6
u/sj2k4 2h ago
BMI is dumb. As a mass indicator for a population’s obesity rate - “maybe useful”.
But at an individual level, BMI can’t tell:
•Body fat percentage
•Muscle mass
•Bone density
•Fitness level
Ignore BMI.
→ More replies (5)
3
u/Medusa-Damage 3h ago
Read about the origins of BMI. It’s a highly flawed metric. So infuriating that it’s still used by the medical profession.
3
u/RespondMinimum9186 2h ago
BMI is total bullshit and I think recent research has said something similar. You look great man, be proud of the work you’ve put in and don’t let yourself be bullied by a bullshit calculation that doesn’t take many of different body types and other factors into consideration!
3
3
u/WebMaka 2h ago
Umm, yeah, BMI is very close to pointless as a health metric. What actually matters for metrics are the results of actual lab work, such as metabolic panels, that tell you what's going on chemically within the body.
My age and height would require me to be about 180 lbs. to have an "ideal" (sub-25) BMI, but I'm 1.8m/6' tall and 60cm/2' wide at the shoulders and the BMI calculations don't consider frame size at all - at 180 lbs. I would look like I have an eating disorder and I would have to surrender muscle mass to cut to that weight.
3
u/Broad_Poetry_9657 1h ago
A smart scale can’t determine accurately if you are overweight. Listen to your actual doctors.
6.3k
u/claudekennilol 3h ago
Dang you're 208 and look like that? You must be tall, right?